Project: Old Guard - lots of pictures

Build and Restoration Threads Belong Here

Moderators: Cal_Gary, T. Highway, Monkey Man, robi

Master Yota
MSGT
MSGT
Posts: 828
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:50 am
Location: Prince George BC Canada
Contact:

Post by Master Yota »

True enough, and good thinking too! I'll have a better idea of space after I get the engine and trans hung.
Ray
1953 CDN. M37
1954 CDN. M152
Wayne64
SSGT
SSGT
Posts: 409
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Long Island NY
Contact:

Post by Wayne64 »

Interesting choice in power plants. The FE will work great but there are a lot of folks that would pay big bucks for that CJ 428 engine. You did get me thinking though,if I did Ford it would be the 429/460 family. Here is a photo of the last FE I built for a 64 Ford, and with the cam I chose was a real torque monster.

Image
MY Life Past and Present
http://crayonmedia.com/wayne/
Master Yota
MSGT
MSGT
Posts: 828
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:50 am
Location: Prince George BC Canada
Contact:

Post by Master Yota »

I chose the 428 mostly because I had it, and secondly its not much bigger dimensionally than a 350. I had a 350 in my previous M37, and loved it. My 428 makes almost double the HP and torque, and I figured that more must be better - right?

Its a reliable engine, with reasonable mileage vs. performance numbers, and its still easy enough to get parts for. They are simple to work on, and virtually bullet proof.

The dimensions were the key factory though, only an inch bigger all the way around over a SBC and only about 70# heavier. That means it weighs about as much as the 251 its replacing...
Ray
1953 CDN. M37
1954 CDN. M152
Master Yota
MSGT
MSGT
Posts: 828
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:50 am
Location: Prince George BC Canada
Contact:

Post by Master Yota »

Got some work done. The crossmember mods are complete and the new shaved unit is back in the truck. Also managed to get a good start on the driver's side boxing of the frame rail.

I plated the crossmember in again using 3/16's plate, formed from 3 separate pieces and fully welded. I replaced the rivets with 7/16 NF G8 bolts with stovers, so they should hold up just fine for a good long time. The top of the crossmember was welded in place originally, so I duplicated that attachment again.

The rail boxing was accomplished with 1/4" plate formed into a channel shape to cover the top and bottom of the rails, on the outside (it fits over the rail). I'll stitch it into place, on both sides, and it should be more than enough to hold the engine in place.

Here is the factory crossmember:
Image

Cutting welds
Image

Removing more rivets
Image

Some BFH work to get it out
Image

And it on the floor - I did measure the rails for spread, and it was minimal - about 3/4" in total.
Image

Here you can see the cut lines - A small square and a piece of chalk was all I used to lay out the lines.

Top side
Image

Bottom side
Image

Severed in half! A 5" grinder with a zip cut makes quick and accurate cuts for this type of job.
Image

The lower plate insert. I don't have any pictures of the two upper-side plates, but I just used the crossmember as a pattern and cut out each side from the scrap I had left over.
Image

After it was fully welded and cleaned up, the bar clamp easily pulled the rails back into position, and once the member was loosely bolted in place, I set the distance between the rails and welded the top side. Afterwards the bolts where snugged up and the crossmember was considered finished.
Image

Image

Here are some shots of the Frame Rail boxing - which will provide a home for the new engine mounts.
There are some dips in the frame, so some relief cuts needed to be made so that the steel could be formed into place with a BFH.
Image

After some adjustments
Image

Image

Stiched into place - on the top left side
Image

Hopefully I'll get some more accomplished this week...
Ray
1953 CDN. M37
1954 CDN. M152
User avatar
m-37Bruce
1SG
1SG
Posts: 2340
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 8:21 pm
Location: Midlothian,VA

U Been Busy

Post by m-37Bruce »

Looking real sharp too, Master Yota.
Bruce,

1953 M-37 w/ow

Retired Again

Keep Em Rollin'

VMVA
User avatar
rixm37
MSGT
MSGT
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:05 am
Location: Tucson AZ

Post by rixm37 »

Great to watch this build!!
1952 M37
M101 trailer
1942 Chevy G506
User avatar
m-37Bruce
1SG
1SG
Posts: 2340
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 8:21 pm
Location: Midlothian,VA

Transfer Case Stuff

Post by m-37Bruce »

Ray, I'm still working on that cd for more info/tool stuff. I forgot to mention that before.
Regards,
Bruce,

1953 M-37 w/ow

Retired Again

Keep Em Rollin'

VMVA
Josh
SFC
SFC
Posts: 702
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:02 pm

Post by Josh »

Ray, why did you take the front brace out instead of reshaping the oilpan? Just asking, not being critical.

Josh
Image
Master Yota
MSGT
MSGT
Posts: 828
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:50 am
Location: Prince George BC Canada
Contact:

Post by Master Yota »

Josh wrote:Ray, why did you take the front brace out instead of reshaping the oilpan? Just asking, not being critical.

Josh
The mods to the front brace are to accomodate the swing of the draglink when I put the crossover steering in. The oilpan should clear just fine as its a rear sump unit.

Even if given a choice in your scenario, I would still mod the crossmember over the oil pan, as the CM dosen't have anything to leak out of it...
Ray
1953 CDN. M37
1954 CDN. M152
Josh
SFC
SFC
Posts: 702
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:02 pm

Post by Josh »

good point! :lol:
Image
shawn085
PVT
PVT
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:01 am

Post by shawn085 »

Looks good. Nice to see another CDN M-37. I could use the engine for mine. Mine needs to be rebuilt and my spare also needs to be rebuilt. I was going to combine the two of them. If yours is a runner than that would get me back on the road for now. Drop me a line and let me know how much and stuff. I could use a bunch of the other bits also.(steering box, trany, PTO, transfer case and drive shafts) I'm down in Vancouver so it would be a bit of a drive to come get it.
1952 cdnM37
Master Yota
MSGT
MSGT
Posts: 828
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:50 am
Location: Prince George BC Canada
Contact:

Post by Master Yota »

Slipped the BBF between the rails on tuesday night. No mounts yet, but at least I have an idea of how its going to fit and what some of the issues might be.

428 and NP435 up in the air and heading for the new home
Image

Pretty good fit so far...
Image

Enough fire wall clearance to keep things happy
Image

Should be enough clearance at the diff too, as the D60 is shaped differently
Image

The exhaust manifold on the passenger side could cause problems. Nobody makes a center dump header either...
Image

The pass. side exhaust manifold prevents me from lowering the engine any futher between the rails. Looks like some major floor surgery might be needed if I can't find another solution.
Image

I'm leaning towards a mild body lift to generate the floor clearance I need and put some space between the exhaust and the body.
Ray
1953 CDN. M37
1954 CDN. M152
chris olson
PFC
PFC
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:16 pm
Location: Burnaby BC

headers

Post by chris olson »

Looks like those manifolds are going to be a pain
Might be time for a header kit...
http://www.speedwaymotors.com/429-460-B ... 37279.html
Image
1952 M37cdn
Josh
SFC
SFC
Posts: 702
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:02 pm

Post by Josh »

looks like it fits pretty well. You're correct on the Dana diff, you'll be fine. That is one thing Ford has always been smart about Vs. GM and Chrysler is ALWAYS putting the dizzy up front. The other two never figured that out with their small blocks. I know it sure helped when I was getting the 400 in position as opposed to the 360.

I'd advise against the body lift, as it will look OK everywhere except dead on in the front. the way the sheetmetal comes right down to the frame will be a tough gap to fill. Have you tried flipping the manifolds over, so the exhaust faces forward... would make for a somewhat convoluted escape from the engine bay, but, it would be better than cutting the floor and frame. Contrary to what most people on here think, I actually dont like cutting on the original structure, I only resort to it if all else fails.

A header kit would also work, as Chris pointed out.

Lastly, you could always route the exhaust outboard of the frame, rather than trying to tuck it back in as it comes down.
Image
Josh
SFC
SFC
Posts: 702
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:02 pm

Post by Josh »

oh, and if you plan on using the stock radiator, I'd try fitting that up there... I eventually gave up on trying to make the stocker work, as the bottom outlet makes it difficult to get a V8 crank pulley to fit.
Image
Post Reply